Etabs manual ppt






















ETABS. Figure is used to illustrate the use of more than one grid system to construct a computer model having complex geometry. Figure shows that a sloped diaphragm can be modeled easily. Reference planes are added to describe the building having various roof elevations. Significant Options of ETABS Exemplified in Example 1 Copy AssignsMissing: ppt. From the data revealed by the manual design as well as software analysis for the structures following conclusions are drawn: 1. Analysis was done by using ETABS software and successfully verified manually as per IS 2. Calculation by both manual work as well as software analysis gives almost same result. 3. Importing to Etabs Building modeling in Etabs Defining and assigning of materials Manual design (as per IS SP) Assigning loads as per IS Analyse the building model Design using Etabs software comparison conclusion Fig METHODOLYGY 5. ANALYSIS RESULT FigD MODEL.


3 Instructor: Dr. C.E. Ventura No. 5 Seismic Design of Multistorey Concrete Structures Dynamic Analysis Procedures (continued) 5) The elastic base shear, V e obtained from a Linear Dynamic Analysis shall be multiplied by the Importance factor I. Wind Loads Above, Figure , Basic Wind Speed (3-second gust), 33 feet above ground, exposure C IBC Zone V 30 (mph) 1 2 3 70 80 90 (Western Mass.) (Central Mass.). Then enter a file name, such as name. "Tutorial 1", in the File name edit box. ETABS will auto- matically add the file extension ".EDB" to the file name. Save the Model fETABS Tutorial Add Structural Objects, Step 7 Initial Model. 3. Click the Save button. This saves the file and closes the form.


From the data revealed by the manual design as well as software analysis for the structures following conclusions are drawn: 1. Analysis was done by using ETABS software and successfully verified manually as per IS 2. Calculation by both manual work as well as software analysis gives almost same result. 3. Microsoft PowerPoint - Lecturea-ETABS-Tutorialppt Author: Luis Created Date: 5/22/ PM. compared calculated by ETABS is also shown in Figure Steel (in2) At point B ETABS Top Bottom 0 Calculated Top Bottom 0 Steel (in2) At point E ETABS Top Bottom 0 Calculated Top Bottom 0 Steel (in2) At point C ETABS Top Bottom 0 Calculated Top Bottom 0 Figure Longitudinal Reinforcement Comparison.

0コメント

  • 1000 / 1000